C
The population of white-tailed deer(白尾鹿) is growing rapidly in many parts of the United States. As the population grows, food becomes a problem. Many deer die of hunger. Others grow up to be small and unhealthy. To search for food, hungry deer move closer to where humans live. They eat crops, vegetables and even trees. Besides, there is a large number of deer near roads. It can cause traffic accidents. People admire the grace and fast speed of deer. Most people don't want these animals to be hungry or ill. Should people take action to control the growing population of deer?
Should People Take Direct Action?
Many people think that hunting is the best way to control the population of the deer. Wildlife managers will see if there's enough food in an area and decide its carrying capacity(容量). Then hunters with licenses are sent to help control(控制) the number of deer. Hunting is usually not allowed in cities or the suburbs(郊区). However, some people have the idea of catching the deer and moving them to other places. But this method is expensive and requires finding another place that can accept the deer without breaking the balance of the ecosystem(生态系统). Scientists are also working to develop chemicals(化学制品) to control the birth rate(率) of the population of the deer. But this plan works for only one year at a time.
Should People Take Indirect Action?
Some suggest bringing in natural enemies(敌人) of deer, such as wolves, lions and bears, to areas with too many deer. But these animals could also hurt dogs, cats, and even humans. Other communities have built tall fences(篱笆) to keep out deer. However, this is impossible for farmers.
▲
Some people are against any kind of action. They support(支持) leaving the deer alone. Animal populations in an area naturally go up and down over time. Doing nothing means that some deer will die of hunger or illness. But finally, the population will reach a size within the carrying capacity of the environment.
So, let nature go its own way.
()7. According to the passage, the growing number of deer can in the area.
A. bring water pollution B. cause traffic accidents
C. bring serious illnesses D. cause nothing
()8. 创新考法—句子还原题 Which one can be put in “▲”?
A. Should People Do Nothing?
B. Should People Protect the Deer?
C. Should People Take Special Action?
D. Should People Drive the Deer Away?
()9. 创新考法—观点态度题 The writer most probably agrees that .
A. farmers can build fences to keep the deer out
B. people should leave the deer alone in the wild
C. hunting is the best way to control the population of the deer
D. it's great to catch the deer and eat them
()10. 创新考法—行文方式题 The writer organizes(组织) this passage by .
A. telling stories
B. using numbers
C. giving opinions
D. describing scenes(场景)
The population of white-tailed deer(白尾鹿) is growing rapidly in many parts of the United States. As the population grows, food becomes a problem. Many deer die of hunger. Others grow up to be small and unhealthy. To search for food, hungry deer move closer to where humans live. They eat crops, vegetables and even trees. Besides, there is a large number of deer near roads. It can cause traffic accidents. People admire the grace and fast speed of deer. Most people don't want these animals to be hungry or ill. Should people take action to control the growing population of deer?
Should People Take Direct Action?
Many people think that hunting is the best way to control the population of the deer. Wildlife managers will see if there's enough food in an area and decide its carrying capacity(容量). Then hunters with licenses are sent to help control(控制) the number of deer. Hunting is usually not allowed in cities or the suburbs(郊区). However, some people have the idea of catching the deer and moving them to other places. But this method is expensive and requires finding another place that can accept the deer without breaking the balance of the ecosystem(生态系统). Scientists are also working to develop chemicals(化学制品) to control the birth rate(率) of the population of the deer. But this plan works for only one year at a time.
Should People Take Indirect Action?
Some suggest bringing in natural enemies(敌人) of deer, such as wolves, lions and bears, to areas with too many deer. But these animals could also hurt dogs, cats, and even humans. Other communities have built tall fences(篱笆) to keep out deer. However, this is impossible for farmers.
▲
Some people are against any kind of action. They support(支持) leaving the deer alone. Animal populations in an area naturally go up and down over time. Doing nothing means that some deer will die of hunger or illness. But finally, the population will reach a size within the carrying capacity of the environment.
So, let nature go its own way.
()7. According to the passage, the growing number of deer can in the area.
A. bring water pollution B. cause traffic accidents
C. bring serious illnesses D. cause nothing
()8. 创新考法—句子还原题 Which one can be put in “▲”?
A. Should People Do Nothing?
B. Should People Protect the Deer?
C. Should People Take Special Action?
D. Should People Drive the Deer Away?
()9. 创新考法—观点态度题 The writer most probably agrees that .
A. farmers can build fences to keep the deer out
B. people should leave the deer alone in the wild
C. hunting is the best way to control the population of the deer
D. it's great to catch the deer and eat them
()10. 创新考法—行文方式题 The writer organizes(组织) this passage by .
A. telling stories
B. using numbers
C. giving opinions
D. describing scenes(场景)
答案：7. B 【点拨】根据“Besides, there is a large number of deer near roads. It can cause traffic accidents.”可知，白尾鹿数量增加会导致交通事故。故选 B。
8. A 【点拨】根据上下文内容，尤其是“Some people are against any kind of action. They support(支持) leaving the deer alone.”可知，选项 A“人们应该什么都不做吗？”符合语境。故选 A。
9. B 【点拨】根据“But finally, the population will reach a size within the carrying capacity of the environment.”和“So, let nature go its own way.”可知，作者认为应该让白尾鹿在野外自由生长。故选 B。
10. C 【点拨】根据全文内容可知，作者通过给出不同的观点来讨论怎样控制白尾鹿的数量。故选 C。
8. A 【点拨】根据上下文内容，尤其是“Some people are against any kind of action. They support(支持) leaving the deer alone.”可知，选项 A“人们应该什么都不做吗？”符合语境。故选 A。
9. B 【点拨】根据“But finally, the population will reach a size within the carrying capacity of the environment.”和“So, let nature go its own way.”可知，作者认为应该让白尾鹿在野外自由生长。故选 B。
10. C 【点拨】根据全文内容可知，作者通过给出不同的观点来讨论怎样控制白尾鹿的数量。故选 C。
解析：
【分析】
这是一篇阅读理解题，解题思路如下：
1. 第7题是细节理解题，先锁定题干提问的“白尾鹿数量增长带来的影响”，回到原文对应段落定位相关描述，排除原文未提及的干扰选项即可得到答案。
2. 第8题是段落小标题类的句子还原题，重点阅读空后的整段内容，提炼该段的核心讨论主题，匹配对应主题的选项即可。
3. 第9题是观点态度题，重点关注文末作者的总结表述，区分部分群体的观点和作者自身的倾向，选出符合作者立场的选项。
4. 第10题是行文方式题，梳理全文的整体框架，判断作者组织内容的逻辑方式，排除不符合的选项。
【解析】
7. 定位原文第一段内容：文中明确提到“Besides, there is a large number of deer near roads. It can cause traffic accidents.”，全文没有提及白尾鹿增长会带来水污染、引发严重疾病的相关表述，A、C选项无依据，D选项和原文内容完全矛盾，因此选B。
8. 空后的段落核心内容是部分人反对任何人为干预，支持放任白尾鹿种群随自然规律自行增减，不需要人为采取管控措施，只有A选项“人们应该什么都不做吗？”完全匹配本段的讨论主题，其余选项的“保护鹿”“采取特殊行动”“驱赶鹿”都不符合本段核心，因此选A。
9. 文末作者给出明确总结句“So, let nature go its own way.”，表明作者支持让自然自行调节，不对白尾鹿种群进行人为干预，对应B选项；A选项原文明确说明建造高篱笆对农民来说不可行，C选项的“狩猎是最佳方式”只是部分人的观点，并非作者认同的内容，D选项文中完全没有相关表述，因此选B。
10. 全文分别从“是否采取直接行动”“是否采取间接行动”“是否完全不行动”三个不同立场，罗列不同群体的观点展开讨论，没有使用讲故事、大量列数字、描述场景的行文方式，因此选C。
【答案】
7. B 8. A 9. B 10. C
【知识点】
细节信息查找，段落主旨匹配，行文结构判断
【点评】
本题围绕白尾鹿种群增长的治理争议展开，既包含常规细节题型，也设置了三类创新考法，解题时要注意区分不同段落的讨论主题，不要把部分群体的观点错当成作者的态度，梳理清楚全文不同立场的分类就能快速锁定正确答案。
【难度系数】
0.7
这是一篇阅读理解题，解题思路如下：
1. 第7题是细节理解题，先锁定题干提问的“白尾鹿数量增长带来的影响”，回到原文对应段落定位相关描述，排除原文未提及的干扰选项即可得到答案。
2. 第8题是段落小标题类的句子还原题，重点阅读空后的整段内容，提炼该段的核心讨论主题，匹配对应主题的选项即可。
3. 第9题是观点态度题，重点关注文末作者的总结表述，区分部分群体的观点和作者自身的倾向，选出符合作者立场的选项。
4. 第10题是行文方式题，梳理全文的整体框架，判断作者组织内容的逻辑方式，排除不符合的选项。
【解析】
7. 定位原文第一段内容：文中明确提到“Besides, there is a large number of deer near roads. It can cause traffic accidents.”，全文没有提及白尾鹿增长会带来水污染、引发严重疾病的相关表述，A、C选项无依据，D选项和原文内容完全矛盾，因此选B。
8. 空后的段落核心内容是部分人反对任何人为干预，支持放任白尾鹿种群随自然规律自行增减，不需要人为采取管控措施，只有A选项“人们应该什么都不做吗？”完全匹配本段的讨论主题，其余选项的“保护鹿”“采取特殊行动”“驱赶鹿”都不符合本段核心，因此选A。
9. 文末作者给出明确总结句“So, let nature go its own way.”，表明作者支持让自然自行调节，不对白尾鹿种群进行人为干预，对应B选项；A选项原文明确说明建造高篱笆对农民来说不可行，C选项的“狩猎是最佳方式”只是部分人的观点，并非作者认同的内容，D选项文中完全没有相关表述，因此选B。
10. 全文分别从“是否采取直接行动”“是否采取间接行动”“是否完全不行动”三个不同立场，罗列不同群体的观点展开讨论，没有使用讲故事、大量列数字、描述场景的行文方式，因此选C。
【答案】
7. B 8. A 9. B 10. C
【知识点】
细节信息查找，段落主旨匹配，行文结构判断
【点评】
本题围绕白尾鹿种群增长的治理争议展开，既包含常规细节题型，也设置了三类创新考法，解题时要注意区分不同段落的讨论主题，不要把部分群体的观点错当成作者的态度，梳理清楚全文不同立场的分类就能快速锁定正确答案。
【难度系数】
0.7