D
Too Good to Be True
When you see a photo of a beach covered in dreamy pink sand on social media (社交媒体), you might wish to visit the place in person. But when you get there, you find nothing but a lake shore (岸) with broken red bricks.
This is one of the many complaints that users have shared online about their disappointing (令人失望的) experiences following travel guides on Xiaohongshu, a lifestyle sharing platform (平台). The app allows users to share travel blogs (博客) and lifestyle stories through short videos and photos.
Some angry users put “before” and “after” photos of these places to show the differences between real life and the online pictures, reported China Daily.
Xiaohongshu apologized (道歉) for posting over-retouched pictures. According to the company, some bloggers did not make it clear that their pictures were works of photography and those pictures were taken as travel guides.
Xiaohongshu said it's going to bring out ranking(排名) lists along with places-to-avoid lists. The move is to make sure users can get more diversified (多样化的) information.
People have different opinions on this matter. Many agree that the beautiful but not real photos are fraudulent (欺骗性的) or misleading. Some, however, say that it is not wrong of people to post beautiful photos, and travellers should learn to tell wisely what is true and what is false.
Gu Huimin, leader of the School of Tourism Sciences from Beijing International Studies University, said that social media companies should have rules about content posted on their platforms.
“Instead of over-retouched pictures, the platforms can show content about the culture of a place,” Gu said. “People, on the other hand, should understand that real travelling is far more than simply ‘checking in’ at an Internet-famous place.”
(
A. not changed at all B. improved to get a better look
C. taken many times D. not shown in a clear way
(
A. offer ranking lists to travellers B. take down some bloggers' accounts (账号)
C. offer official travel guides to users D. pay back money to users who were misled
(
A. introduce how to tell between real and unreal content
B. show examples of people who were misled
C. explain why some bloggers post unreal content
D. show what people think about the matter
(
A. Xiaohongshu should be taken down from the app shop.
B. The platform should keep an eye on its content.
C. People who post unreal content should be punished.
D. Travellers should make careful plans before setting out.
Too Good to Be True
When you see a photo of a beach covered in dreamy pink sand on social media (社交媒体), you might wish to visit the place in person. But when you get there, you find nothing but a lake shore (岸) with broken red bricks.
This is one of the many complaints that users have shared online about their disappointing (令人失望的) experiences following travel guides on Xiaohongshu, a lifestyle sharing platform (平台). The app allows users to share travel blogs (博客) and lifestyle stories through short videos and photos.
Some angry users put “before” and “after” photos of these places to show the differences between real life and the online pictures, reported China Daily.
Xiaohongshu apologized (道歉) for posting over-retouched pictures. According to the company, some bloggers did not make it clear that their pictures were works of photography and those pictures were taken as travel guides.
Xiaohongshu said it's going to bring out ranking(排名) lists along with places-to-avoid lists. The move is to make sure users can get more diversified (多样化的) information.
People have different opinions on this matter. Many agree that the beautiful but not real photos are fraudulent (欺骗性的) or misleading. Some, however, say that it is not wrong of people to post beautiful photos, and travellers should learn to tell wisely what is true and what is false.
Gu Huimin, leader of the School of Tourism Sciences from Beijing International Studies University, said that social media companies should have rules about content posted on their platforms.
“Instead of over-retouched pictures, the platforms can show content about the culture of a place,” Gu said. “People, on the other hand, should understand that real travelling is far more than simply ‘checking in’ at an Internet-famous place.”
(
B
)11. From Paragraph 4, we can know that over-retouched pictures mean pictures that are ______.A. not changed at all B. improved to get a better look
C. taken many times D. not shown in a clear way
(
A
)12. To solve the problem, Xiaohongshu will ______.A. offer ranking lists to travellers B. take down some bloggers' accounts (账号)
C. offer official travel guides to users D. pay back money to users who were misled
(
D
)13. Paragraph 6 is written to ______.A. introduce how to tell between real and unreal content
B. show examples of people who were misled
C. explain why some bloggers post unreal content
D. show what people think about the matter
(
B
)14. What is Gu Huimin's opinion?A. Xiaohongshu should be taken down from the app shop.
B. The platform should keep an eye on its content.
C. People who post unreal content should be punished.
D. Travellers should make careful plans before setting out.
答案：11. B 12. A 13. D 14. B
解析：
翻译:
### D
### 好得难以置信
当你在社交媒体上看到一张覆盖着梦幻粉色沙子的海滩照片时，你可能希望亲自去那个地方看看。但当你到达那里时，你发现只有一个有着破损红砖的湖岸。
这是用户在生活方式分享平台小红书上分享的众多关于其跟随旅行指南却收获令人失望体验的抱怨之一。该应用程序允许用户通过短视频和照片分享旅行博客和生活方式故事。
据《中国日报》报道，一些愤怒的用户张贴了这些地方的“之前”和“之后”的照片，以展示现实生活和网上照片之间的差异。
小红书为发布过度修饰的照片道歉。据该公司称，一些博主没有说清楚他们的照片是摄影作品，而且那些照片被当作了旅行指南。
小红书表示，它将推出排名列表以及应避开的地点列表。此举是为了确保用户能获得更多样化的信息。
人们对这件事有不同的看法。许多人认为这些美丽但不真实的照片具有欺骗性或误导性。然而，一些人说，人们发布美丽的照片并没有错，旅行者应该学会明智地分辨什么是真实的，什么是虚假的。
北京第二外国语学院旅游科学学院的负责人顾惠民说，社交媒体公司应该对其平台上发布的内容有规定。
“平台可以展示关于一个地方文化的内容，而不是过度修饰的照片，”顾说。“另一方面，人们应该明白，真正的旅行远不止是在一个网红地点‘打卡’。”
11. 从第四段，我们可以知道过度修饰的照片是指______的照片。
A. 完全没有改变
B. 经过美化以获得更好的外观
C. 拍摄了很多次
D. 展示得不清楚
12. 为了解决这个问题，小红书将______。
A. 为旅行者提供排名列表
B. 注销一些博主的账号
C. 为用户提供官方旅行指南
D. 向被误导的用户退款
13. 第六段的写作目的是______。
A. 介绍如何区分真实和不真实的内容
B. 展示被误导的人的例子
C. 解释为什么一些博主发布不真实的内容
D. 展示人们对这件事的看法
14. 顾惠民的观点是什么？
A. 小红书应该从应用商店下架。
B. 平台应该关注其内容。
C. 发布不真实内容的人应该受到惩罚。
D. 旅行者在出发前应该仔细规划。
### D
### 好得难以置信
当你在社交媒体上看到一张覆盖着梦幻粉色沙子的海滩照片时，你可能希望亲自去那个地方看看。但当你到达那里时，你发现只有一个有着破损红砖的湖岸。
这是用户在生活方式分享平台小红书上分享的众多关于其跟随旅行指南却收获令人失望体验的抱怨之一。该应用程序允许用户通过短视频和照片分享旅行博客和生活方式故事。
据《中国日报》报道，一些愤怒的用户张贴了这些地方的“之前”和“之后”的照片，以展示现实生活和网上照片之间的差异。
小红书为发布过度修饰的照片道歉。据该公司称，一些博主没有说清楚他们的照片是摄影作品，而且那些照片被当作了旅行指南。
小红书表示，它将推出排名列表以及应避开的地点列表。此举是为了确保用户能获得更多样化的信息。
人们对这件事有不同的看法。许多人认为这些美丽但不真实的照片具有欺骗性或误导性。然而，一些人说，人们发布美丽的照片并没有错，旅行者应该学会明智地分辨什么是真实的，什么是虚假的。
北京第二外国语学院旅游科学学院的负责人顾惠民说，社交媒体公司应该对其平台上发布的内容有规定。
“平台可以展示关于一个地方文化的内容，而不是过度修饰的照片，”顾说。“另一方面，人们应该明白，真正的旅行远不止是在一个网红地点‘打卡’。”
11. 从第四段，我们可以知道过度修饰的照片是指______的照片。
A. 完全没有改变
B. 经过美化以获得更好的外观
C. 拍摄了很多次
D. 展示得不清楚
12. 为了解决这个问题，小红书将______。
A. 为旅行者提供排名列表
B. 注销一些博主的账号
C. 为用户提供官方旅行指南
D. 向被误导的用户退款
13. 第六段的写作目的是______。
A. 介绍如何区分真实和不真实的内容
B. 展示被误导的人的例子
C. 解释为什么一些博主发布不真实的内容
D. 展示人们对这件事的看法
14. 顾惠民的观点是什么？
A. 小红书应该从应用商店下架。
B. 平台应该关注其内容。
C. 发布不真实内容的人应该受到惩罚。
D. 旅行者在出发前应该仔细规划。