五、选择合适的选项补全对话。
A. Do you have rice or noodles?
B. What about lunch and dinner?
C. For dinner, we have steak, chicken and vegetables.
D. People in different countries have different food.
E. But in America, we like to eat beef.
Liu Tao: Hi, Peter. You're from America. Can you tell me what people eat in America?
Peter: Sure. Chinese people like to eat pork. 1.
Liu Tao: I see. Beef is more popular. 2.
Peter: No. For breakfast, we have bread and milk.
Liu Tao: 3.
Peter: For lunch, we have sandwiches, hamburgers or hot dogs. 4.
Liu Tao: Some Chinese people like to eat ice creams in summer.
Peter: Well, some Americans eat them for almost every meal. Americans like sweet food.
Liu Tao: That's why some Americans are fat. 5.
Peter: That's right.
A. Do you have rice or noodles?
B. What about lunch and dinner?
C. For dinner, we have steak, chicken and vegetables.
D. People in different countries have different food.
E. But in America, we like to eat beef.
Liu Tao: Hi, Peter. You're from America. Can you tell me what people eat in America?
Peter: Sure. Chinese people like to eat pork. 1.
E
Liu Tao: I see. Beef is more popular. 2.
A
Peter: No. For breakfast, we have bread and milk.
Liu Tao: 3.
B
Peter: For lunch, we have sandwiches, hamburgers or hot dogs. 4.
C
Liu Tao: Some Chinese people like to eat ice creams in summer.
Peter: Well, some Americans eat them for almost every meal. Americans like sweet food.
Liu Tao: That's why some Americans are fat. 5.
D
Peter: That's right.
答案：1. E 2. A 3. B 4. C 5. D
解析：
【分析】
这是一道情景补全对话题，对话核心围绕中美饮食文化差异展开。解题时首先通读所有备选选项和完整对话，明确整体讨论主题，之后逐空结合上下文的前后句逻辑匹配选项：第一空前文提到中国人爱吃猪肉，后文刘涛紧接着提到美国牛肉更受欢迎，空缺处需要承接中美肉类偏好的差异；第二空后Peter用No开头作答，还引出了早餐的餐食介绍，说明空缺处是和早餐食物相关的疑问；第三空后Peter直接介绍午餐的食物，说明空缺处是询问午晚餐相关内容的问句；第四空前半句刚说完午餐的餐食，顺理成章要引出晚餐的餐食介绍；第五空后Peter表示认同，空缺处是对整段对话不同国家饮食差异的总结句，最后代入所有选项通读验证逻辑通顺即可。
【解析】
1. 第一空：前文提到中国人喜欢吃猪肉，后文引出美国牛肉更受欢迎的表述，E选项"But in America, we like to eat beef."（但是在美国，我们喜欢吃牛肉）刚好承接中美肉类偏好的对比，符合语境。
2. 第二空：后文Peter回答" No. For breakfast, we have bread and milk."，说明空缺处是询问餐食的选择疑问句，A选项"Do you have rice or noodles?"（你们吃米饭还是面条？）符合问答逻辑。
3. 第三空：后文Peter开始介绍午餐的餐食内容，说明刘涛此时是询问午餐和晚餐的相关情况，B选项"What about lunch and dinner?"（那午餐和晚餐呢？）衔接自然。
4. 第四空：前文刚介绍完午餐的食物，接下来顺承介绍晚餐的餐食，C选项"For dinner, we have steak, chicken and vegetables."（晚餐我们吃牛排、鸡肉和蔬菜）符合叙事逻辑。
5. 第五空：对话前面分别讨论了中美饮食的各类差异，空缺处是总结性表述，D选项"People in different countries have different food."（不同国家的人吃不同的食物）和后文Peter的认同完全呼应。
【答案】
1.E 2.A 3.B 4.C 5.D
【知识点】
情景交际，补全对话，饮食类英语表达
【点评】
本题围绕学生熟悉的日常饮食话题展开，解题核心是抓住问答之间的对应关系、上下文的逻辑呼应，做完后将选项代入全文通读一遍，就能快速验证逻辑是否通顺，很适合锻炼学生的英语情景对话理解能力。
【难度系数】
0.8
这是一道情景补全对话题，对话核心围绕中美饮食文化差异展开。解题时首先通读所有备选选项和完整对话，明确整体讨论主题，之后逐空结合上下文的前后句逻辑匹配选项：第一空前文提到中国人爱吃猪肉，后文刘涛紧接着提到美国牛肉更受欢迎，空缺处需要承接中美肉类偏好的差异；第二空后Peter用No开头作答，还引出了早餐的餐食介绍，说明空缺处是和早餐食物相关的疑问；第三空后Peter直接介绍午餐的食物，说明空缺处是询问午晚餐相关内容的问句；第四空前半句刚说完午餐的餐食，顺理成章要引出晚餐的餐食介绍；第五空后Peter表示认同，空缺处是对整段对话不同国家饮食差异的总结句，最后代入所有选项通读验证逻辑通顺即可。
【解析】
1. 第一空：前文提到中国人喜欢吃猪肉，后文引出美国牛肉更受欢迎的表述，E选项"But in America, we like to eat beef."（但是在美国，我们喜欢吃牛肉）刚好承接中美肉类偏好的对比，符合语境。
2. 第二空：后文Peter回答" No. For breakfast, we have bread and milk."，说明空缺处是询问餐食的选择疑问句，A选项"Do you have rice or noodles?"（你们吃米饭还是面条？）符合问答逻辑。
3. 第三空：后文Peter开始介绍午餐的餐食内容，说明刘涛此时是询问午餐和晚餐的相关情况，B选项"What about lunch and dinner?"（那午餐和晚餐呢？）衔接自然。
4. 第四空：前文刚介绍完午餐的食物，接下来顺承介绍晚餐的餐食，C选项"For dinner, we have steak, chicken and vegetables."（晚餐我们吃牛排、鸡肉和蔬菜）符合叙事逻辑。
5. 第五空：对话前面分别讨论了中美饮食的各类差异，空缺处是总结性表述，D选项"People in different countries have different food."（不同国家的人吃不同的食物）和后文Peter的认同完全呼应。
【答案】
1.E 2.A 3.B 4.C 5.D
【知识点】
情景交际，补全对话，饮食类英语表达
【点评】
本题围绕学生熟悉的日常饮食话题展开，解题核心是抓住问答之间的对应关系、上下文的逻辑呼应，做完后将选项代入全文通读一遍，就能快速验证逻辑是否通顺，很适合锻炼学生的英语情景对话理解能力。
【难度系数】
0.8
六、阅读短文,回答问题。
Do you know how to keep safe when you take a bus? First, don't run or play at the bus stop. Second, don't talk with the bus driver. Don't throw things on the bus or out of the windows. Don't play near the emergency exit (紧急出口). When there is a fire, the most important thing is to break the windows with a hammer or sharp things and then jump out. Third, after you get off the bus, you should walk away and look out for moving buses. Last, if you drop something near the bus, tell the driver before you try to pick it up.
1. Can we run and play at the bus stop?
2. When there is a fire, how can we break the windows?
3. What should we do after getting off the bus?
4. Can we pick up the things near the bus if we don't tell the driver? Why?
Do you know how to keep safe when you take a bus? First, don't run or play at the bus stop. Second, don't talk with the bus driver. Don't throw things on the bus or out of the windows. Don't play near the emergency exit (紧急出口). When there is a fire, the most important thing is to break the windows with a hammer or sharp things and then jump out. Third, after you get off the bus, you should walk away and look out for moving buses. Last, if you drop something near the bus, tell the driver before you try to pick it up.
1. Can we run and play at the bus stop?
No, we can't.
2. When there is a fire, how can we break the windows?
We can break the windows with a hammer or sharp things.
3. What should we do after getting off the bus?
We should walk away and look out for moving buses.
4. Can we pick up the things near the bus if we don't tell the driver? Why?
No, we can't. Because it's not safe.
答案：1. No, we can't.
2. We can break the windows with a
hammer or sharp things.
3. We should walk away and look out for
moving buses.
4. No, we can't. Because it's not safe.
2. We can break the windows with a
hammer or sharp things.
3. We should walk away and look out for
moving buses.
4. No, we can't. Because it's not safe.
解析：
【分析】
这是一篇围绕乘车安全展开的细节类阅读理解题，解题时可以先通读所有题干问题，带着问题回到短文中逐一定位对应的原文内容：第一题匹配站台乘车前的规则，第二题匹配火灾突发场景的处置要求，第三题匹配下车后的行为规范，第四题匹配掉落物品的处理规则，找到原文对应表述后整理成符合要求的回答即可，少量推导类问题结合全文的安全主题补充合理原因就能完成作答。
【解析】
1. 定位原文第一点规则"First, don't run or play at the bus stop."，明确说明不允许在公交站台追逐打闹，因此给出否定回答。
2. 定位原文火灾相关的处置说明"When there is a fire, the most important thing is to break the windows with a hammer or sharp things and then jump out."，直接提取破窗的正确方式即可得到答案。
3. 定位原文下车后的行为要求"Third, after you get off the bus, you should walk away and look out for moving buses."，直接提取对应的规范行为即可。
4. 定位原文最后一条规则"Last, if you drop something near the bus, tell the driver before you try to pick it up."，如果不告知司机就直接在车旁捡东西，司机无法察觉车旁的人员，很容易发生碰撞危险，因此给出否定回答，结合全文安全主题说明原因是不安全。
【答案】
1. No, we can't.
2. We can break the windows with a hammer or sharp things.
3. We should walk away and look out for moving buses.
4. No, we can't. Because it's not safe.
【知识点】
阅读理解细节定位；公共交通安全常识；一般疑问句应答
【点评】
本题属于小学英语基础阅读题型，绝大多数考点都可以直接在原文中找到对应线索，重点考察学生快速检索文本信息的能力，同时也向学生普及了乘坐公共汽车的安全注意事项，仅最后一问需要结合文本主旨推导原因，整体作答门槛很低。
【难度系数】
0.8
这是一篇围绕乘车安全展开的细节类阅读理解题，解题时可以先通读所有题干问题，带着问题回到短文中逐一定位对应的原文内容：第一题匹配站台乘车前的规则，第二题匹配火灾突发场景的处置要求，第三题匹配下车后的行为规范，第四题匹配掉落物品的处理规则，找到原文对应表述后整理成符合要求的回答即可，少量推导类问题结合全文的安全主题补充合理原因就能完成作答。
【解析】
1. 定位原文第一点规则"First, don't run or play at the bus stop."，明确说明不允许在公交站台追逐打闹，因此给出否定回答。
2. 定位原文火灾相关的处置说明"When there is a fire, the most important thing is to break the windows with a hammer or sharp things and then jump out."，直接提取破窗的正确方式即可得到答案。
3. 定位原文下车后的行为要求"Third, after you get off the bus, you should walk away and look out for moving buses."，直接提取对应的规范行为即可。
4. 定位原文最后一条规则"Last, if you drop something near the bus, tell the driver before you try to pick it up."，如果不告知司机就直接在车旁捡东西，司机无法察觉车旁的人员，很容易发生碰撞危险，因此给出否定回答，结合全文安全主题说明原因是不安全。
【答案】
1. No, we can't.
2. We can break the windows with a hammer or sharp things.
3. We should walk away and look out for moving buses.
4. No, we can't. Because it's not safe.
【知识点】
阅读理解细节定位；公共交通安全常识；一般疑问句应答
【点评】
本题属于小学英语基础阅读题型，绝大多数考点都可以直接在原文中找到对应线索，重点考察学生快速检索文本信息的能力，同时也向学生普及了乘坐公共汽车的安全注意事项，仅最后一问需要结合文本主旨推导原因，整体作答门槛很低。
【难度系数】
0.8