B
Scientists from Spain and the Netherlands did a study and discovered that road traffic noise near schools could cause problems for children.
In the study, Maria Foraster and her team from the Barcelona Institute for Global Health worked with 2,680 children aged 7—10 at 38 schools in Barcelona, Spain. They tested the children's thinking and memory skills by giving them four computer tests over a year. There researchers looked at the noise both inside and outside the schools. They also estimated(估算) the noise levels at the children's homes. Air pollution, people's home locations, and other related factors(相关因素) were also considered.
The results(结果) showed that children in noisy schools had a hard time remembering and paying attention to things compared to children in quiet schools. When children were inside the classroom, changing traffic noise was an even bigger problem for them than just loud traffic noise. And no connection was found between noise at home and children's learning abilities.
One limitation(局限性) of the study was that the researchers did not study the noise levels from the past, which might have influenced the test scores. However, 98% of the children had been in the same school for at least a year, and the noise levels did not usually change very fast.
This study is important because many children worldwide are exposed to(遭受) traffic noise in schools. The researchers advised that more tests should be done in other places to see if the results are the same for different groups of children. If the answer is yes, this discovery might change the future rules about noise pollution near schools.
6. What do we know about the study from Paragraph 2?
①Its results. ②Its researchers.
③How it was made.
④Where it was carried out.
A. ①②③
B. ①②④
C. ②③④
D. ①③④
7. According to the study, what kind of noise had a greater influence on children's learning abilities?
A. Just loud traffic noise.
B. Changing traffic noise.
C. Noise from their neighbours.
D. Noise from their classmates.
8. What can we learn from Paragraph 4?
A. The study is of great importance.
B. The study has thought about all factors.
C. The study could be carried out better.
D. The study fits most children in the world.
9. The writer wrote the passage to .
A. ask for rules about noise pollution
B. be against the building of schools near busy roads
C. tell readers about the influences of traffic noise on adults
D. introduce a study on the influences of traffic noise on children
10. 新考法 创新设问 What's the structure of the passage?
A. Introduction → Steps → Findings → Limitation→Meanings.
B. Introduction → Limitation → Steps → Findings→Meanings.
C. Meanings → Introduction → Findings → Limitation→Steps.
D. Meanings → Findings → Limitation → Introduction→Steps.
Scientists from Spain and the Netherlands did a study and discovered that road traffic noise near schools could cause problems for children.
In the study, Maria Foraster and her team from the Barcelona Institute for Global Health worked with 2,680 children aged 7—10 at 38 schools in Barcelona, Spain. They tested the children's thinking and memory skills by giving them four computer tests over a year. There researchers looked at the noise both inside and outside the schools. They also estimated(估算) the noise levels at the children's homes. Air pollution, people's home locations, and other related factors(相关因素) were also considered.
The results(结果) showed that children in noisy schools had a hard time remembering and paying attention to things compared to children in quiet schools. When children were inside the classroom, changing traffic noise was an even bigger problem for them than just loud traffic noise. And no connection was found between noise at home and children's learning abilities.
One limitation(局限性) of the study was that the researchers did not study the noise levels from the past, which might have influenced the test scores. However, 98% of the children had been in the same school for at least a year, and the noise levels did not usually change very fast.
This study is important because many children worldwide are exposed to(遭受) traffic noise in schools. The researchers advised that more tests should be done in other places to see if the results are the same for different groups of children. If the answer is yes, this discovery might change the future rules about noise pollution near schools.
6. What do we know about the study from Paragraph 2?
①Its results. ②Its researchers.
③How it was made.
④Where it was carried out.
A. ①②③
B. ①②④
C. ②③④
D. ①③④
7. According to the study, what kind of noise had a greater influence on children's learning abilities?
A. Just loud traffic noise.
B. Changing traffic noise.
C. Noise from their neighbours.
D. Noise from their classmates.
8. What can we learn from Paragraph 4?
A. The study is of great importance.
B. The study has thought about all factors.
C. The study could be carried out better.
D. The study fits most children in the world.
9. The writer wrote the passage to .
A. ask for rules about noise pollution
B. be against the building of schools near busy roads
C. tell readers about the influences of traffic noise on adults
D. introduce a study on the influences of traffic noise on children
10. 新考法 创新设问 What's the structure of the passage?
A. Introduction → Steps → Findings → Limitation→Meanings.
B. Introduction → Limitation → Steps → Findings→Meanings.
C. Meanings → Introduction → Findings → Limitation→Steps.
D. Meanings → Findings → Limitation → Introduction→Steps.
答案：6 - 10 CBCDA
【语篇解读】本文是一篇说明文，主要介绍了西班牙和荷兰的科学家做了一项研究，发现学校附近的交通噪音会对儿童造成问题。
6. C 解析:细节理解题。根据“In the study，Maria Foraster and her team... worked with 2，680 children aged 7 - 10 at 38 schools in Barcelona，Spain... by giving them four computer tests over a year.”可知，第二段介绍了研究人员、研究过程及研究地点。故选 C。
7. B 解析:细节理解题。根据“When children were inside the classroom，changing traffic noise was an even bigger problem for them than just loud traffic noise.”可知，研究表明，不断变化的交通噪音对孩子的学习能力影响更大。故选 B。
8. C 解析:推理判断题。根据“One limitation of the study was that the researchers did not study the noise levels from the past，which might have influenced the test scores.”可推知，这项研究存在局限性，还有改进的空间。故选 C。
9. D 解析:写作意图题。通读全文内容可知，本文主要介绍了西班牙和荷兰的科学家做了一项研究，发现学校附近的交通噪音会对儿童造成问题，作者并没有针对研究成果发出倡议。故选 D。
10. A 解析:篇章结构题。通读全文内容可知，文章第一段介绍了这项研究，第二段介绍了研究步骤、研究方法，第三段说明了研究结果，第四段介绍了研究的局限性，第五段介绍了研究的意义。故选 A。
【语篇解读】本文是一篇说明文，主要介绍了西班牙和荷兰的科学家做了一项研究，发现学校附近的交通噪音会对儿童造成问题。
6. C 解析:细节理解题。根据“In the study，Maria Foraster and her team... worked with 2，680 children aged 7 - 10 at 38 schools in Barcelona，Spain... by giving them four computer tests over a year.”可知，第二段介绍了研究人员、研究过程及研究地点。故选 C。
7. B 解析:细节理解题。根据“When children were inside the classroom，changing traffic noise was an even bigger problem for them than just loud traffic noise.”可知，研究表明，不断变化的交通噪音对孩子的学习能力影响更大。故选 B。
8. C 解析:推理判断题。根据“One limitation of the study was that the researchers did not study the noise levels from the past，which might have influenced the test scores.”可推知，这项研究存在局限性，还有改进的空间。故选 C。
9. D 解析:写作意图题。通读全文内容可知，本文主要介绍了西班牙和荷兰的科学家做了一项研究，发现学校附近的交通噪音会对儿童造成问题，作者并没有针对研究成果发出倡议。故选 D。
10. A 解析:篇章结构题。通读全文内容可知，文章第一段介绍了这项研究，第二段介绍了研究步骤、研究方法，第三段说明了研究结果，第四段介绍了研究的局限性，第五段介绍了研究的意义。故选 A。
解析：
翻译:
### B
来自西班牙和荷兰的科学家进行了一项研究，发现学校附近的道路交通噪音可能会给孩子们带来问题。
在这项研究中，来自巴塞罗那全球健康研究所的玛丽亚·福拉斯特及其团队与西班牙巴塞罗那38所学校的2680名7至10岁的儿童合作。在一年的时间里，他们通过让孩子们进行四次电脑测试来检验他们的思维和记忆能力。研究人员观察了学校内外的噪音情况。他们还估算了孩子们家中的噪音水平。空气污染、人们的家庭住址以及其他相关因素也被考虑在内。
结果显示，与在安静学校的孩子相比，在嘈杂学校的孩子很难记住事情并集中注意力。当孩子们在教室里时，变化的交通噪音对他们来说比单纯的大交通噪音是一个更大的问题。而且，家庭噪音与孩子的学习能力之间没有关联。
这项研究的一个局限性是，研究人员没有研究过去的噪音水平，而过去的噪音水平可能会影响测试成绩。然而，98%的孩子至少在同一所学校待了一年，而且噪音水平通常不会变化得很快。
这项研究很重要，因为全世界有很多孩子在学校里遭受交通噪音的影响。研究人员建议在其他地方进行更多的测试，以看看不同群体的孩子是否会有相同的结果。如果答案是肯定的，这一发现可能会改变未来关于学校附近噪音污染的规定。
6. 从第二段中我们对这项研究有什么了解？
①它的结果。②它的研究人员。
③它是如何进行的。④它是在哪里进行的。
A. ①②③
B. ①②④
C. ②③④
D. ①③④
7. 根据这项研究，哪种噪音对孩子的学习能力影响更大？
A. 仅仅是大的交通噪音。
B. 变化的交通噪音。
C. 来自邻居的噪音。
D. 来自同学的噪音。
8. 我们从第四段中能了解到什么？
A. 这项研究非常重要。
B. 这项研究考虑了所有因素。
C. 这项研究本可以进行得更好。
D. 这项研究适用于世界上大多数孩子。
9. 作者写这篇文章是为了 。
A. 要求制定关于噪音污染的规定
B. 反对在繁忙道路附近建学校
C. 告诉读者交通噪音对成年人的影响
D. 介绍一项关于交通噪音对儿童影响的研究
10. 新考法 创新设问 这篇文章的结构是什么？
A. 引言→步骤→发现→局限性→意义。
B. 引言→局限性→步骤→发现→意义。
C. 意义→引言→发现→局限性→步骤。
D. 意义→发现→局限性→引言→步骤。
### B
来自西班牙和荷兰的科学家进行了一项研究，发现学校附近的道路交通噪音可能会给孩子们带来问题。
在这项研究中，来自巴塞罗那全球健康研究所的玛丽亚·福拉斯特及其团队与西班牙巴塞罗那38所学校的2680名7至10岁的儿童合作。在一年的时间里，他们通过让孩子们进行四次电脑测试来检验他们的思维和记忆能力。研究人员观察了学校内外的噪音情况。他们还估算了孩子们家中的噪音水平。空气污染、人们的家庭住址以及其他相关因素也被考虑在内。
结果显示，与在安静学校的孩子相比，在嘈杂学校的孩子很难记住事情并集中注意力。当孩子们在教室里时，变化的交通噪音对他们来说比单纯的大交通噪音是一个更大的问题。而且，家庭噪音与孩子的学习能力之间没有关联。
这项研究的一个局限性是，研究人员没有研究过去的噪音水平，而过去的噪音水平可能会影响测试成绩。然而，98%的孩子至少在同一所学校待了一年，而且噪音水平通常不会变化得很快。
这项研究很重要，因为全世界有很多孩子在学校里遭受交通噪音的影响。研究人员建议在其他地方进行更多的测试，以看看不同群体的孩子是否会有相同的结果。如果答案是肯定的，这一发现可能会改变未来关于学校附近噪音污染的规定。
6. 从第二段中我们对这项研究有什么了解？
①它的结果。②它的研究人员。
③它是如何进行的。④它是在哪里进行的。
A. ①②③
B. ①②④
C. ②③④
D. ①③④
7. 根据这项研究，哪种噪音对孩子的学习能力影响更大？
A. 仅仅是大的交通噪音。
B. 变化的交通噪音。
C. 来自邻居的噪音。
D. 来自同学的噪音。
8. 我们从第四段中能了解到什么？
A. 这项研究非常重要。
B. 这项研究考虑了所有因素。
C. 这项研究本可以进行得更好。
D. 这项研究适用于世界上大多数孩子。
9. 作者写这篇文章是为了 。
A. 要求制定关于噪音污染的规定
B. 反对在繁忙道路附近建学校
C. 告诉读者交通噪音对成年人的影响
D. 介绍一项关于交通噪音对儿童影响的研究
10. 新考法 创新设问 这篇文章的结构是什么？
A. 引言→步骤→发现→局限性→意义。
B. 引言→局限性→步骤→发现→意义。
C. 意义→引言→发现→局限性→步骤。
D. 意义→发现→局限性→引言→步骤。